\n \n \n “. concat(self. i18n. t(‘search. voice. recognition_retry’), “\n
German media reacted angrily to their side’s loss to England on Sunday, accusing a “new Wembley” of depriving them of victory.
The bild tabloid blamed an alleged mistake by the referee in the 25th minute of the match. In an article titled “Rage after Wembley Scandal, he wrote: “German footballers lost a clear penalty against England in the Euro final and lost dramatically in another time 1-2. At Wembley from all places!
“Referee Kateryna Monzul did not see a transparent hand from England captain Leah Williamson on the line. “The moment was verified through the VAR but no punishable hand was found.
Bild wrote: “56 years after Wembley’s poorly assigned goal at the Wembley final in 1966, our women are again suffering fraud in a final against England. This time despite the video footage!The 1-2 after extra time looks ugly and rotten. “smell.
It was a reference to England’s notorious third additional half in the 1966 World Cup final, which officials said had crossed the line. England eventually won 4-2.
The newspaper turned to the German team and said: “You lost. But those who lose through fraud are the winners.
On Monday morning, other articles on its online page included one about Chloe Kelly’s iconic goals birthday party, which was titled: “Take Off Your Shirt!The naked madness of England.
Another about the German team, with the title: “The frustration of our heroines of the European Championship”
Bild also took aim at the British press for covering up the “new Wembley scam”.
They wrote: “The women of the DFB were denied a transparent penalty in the 25th minute. But the British media need to know something about it, say a word about the scene where captain Williamson hits the ball with her hand transparently.
The daily Der Tagesspiegel said the ultimate skill point was “higher than ever. “They adopted a more conciliatory tone, praising Germany or England well. “The two most productive teams in the European Championship have shown all their capabilities, both tactically and technically,” they wrote.
Süddeutsche Zeitung reflected on the effect the game would have on women’s football. “This European Championship wasn’t just about who would win the trophy in the end,” Dreher wrote.
“But also about the effect of this event. The DFB in particular will not have to miss any other opportunity. “
Summing up the match, Ms Dreher said: “The German team has to deal with the short-term absence of captain Popp and is beaten by England in extra time. The latter is characterized by duels, and at least one questionable penalty scene.
An average of 17. 9 million viewers watched the final in Germany, about 5. 7 million more than the semi-final opposite France. This is the highest audience recorded for a women’s football match in Germany since the 2011 World Cup, which was held in the country.
Der Spiegel also hoped the adjustment would have a lasting impact. “Germany did not win the final of the European Championship, but we are already looking at the long term; some of the hype will have to remain,” they wrote.