This week, Democrats sought to draw attention to proposals to expand health care in the United States, with the White House revealing its priorities in a new budget request and members of a House committee reviewing the “Medicare for All” approach.
President Joe Biden’s budget request for fiscal year 2023, which begins Oct. 1, calls on Congress to increase investment in intellectual fitness and systems to treat others with opioid use disorder. Members of Congress have reached bipartisan agreement on those two issues in recent years, making Biden’s proposals seem feasible.
In the coming weeks, congressional committees will delve into the main points of Biden’s request, which was unveiled on March 28.
The House Supply Committee will hold a hearing on March 31 on the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Proposal. Members of this committee will likely delve into white house plans for federal investment agencies, adding the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. On April 5, the House Ways and Means Committee, which oversees Medicare and Medicaid, will hold its hearing on the HHS budget. invoices and the operation of personal insurance plans.
However, regardless of the review of Biden’s budget request, some Democrats are continuing their efforts to push for a primary review of how America will pay for physical care.
The House Oversight and Reform Committee held a hearing Tuesday to draw attention to the barriers that prevent many other people in the United States from receiving health care. The Medicare for All bill proposed by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) was highlighted in the hearing.
Jayapal’s bill would identify a national government-run fitness insurance program and restrict the use of personal insurance to parties not covered by the new federal plan. According to your bill, creating a new federal insurance program would not provide a policy through the Department of Veterans. Issues or the Indigenous Health Service.
Other Democrats have proposed a less radical plan, known informally as Medicare for those who need it. Officially titled the Medicare-X Choice Act, this bill through Rep. Antonio Delgado (D-NY) would create a federal fitness plan to compete with insurance exchanges. with donations from personal insurers such as UnitedHealth and Blue Cross.
Opposing Jayapal’s bill at the hearing, a witness called through Republican members of the committee. Grace-Marie Turner, president of the nonprofit Galen Institute, said implementing Jayapal’s bill would lead to primary disruption.
“While the promises of Medicare for All seem utopian, what about the vast majority of at least 173 million people who don’t need to give up their professional insurance?What if 64 million seniors like their existing Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans and you don’t. Turner asked in his testimony. “And what about union members who have made significant wage sacrifices to earn their benefits?”
Democrats’ chances of succeeding in creating a large national health insurance program for single people seem decidedly slim, at least in the short term. Jayapal’s bill attracted the attention of only a portion of his Democratic colleagues in the House and no Republicans.
Democrats used Tuesday’s House oversight hearing to highlight how fitness plans take the money consumers give them for health care and spend it on things like promotions.
A government-run formula would be more effective because it would generate that waste, Democrats said.
Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) asked a panel witness, Sarah R. Collins, PhD, vice president of health care policy and at the nonprofit Commonwealth Fund, to examine the difference in administrative pricing between Medicare and personal plans. Medicare administrative fees consume about 3 to 5 percent of the giant federal program’s budget, compared with 17 to 18 percent for personal insurers, Collins said.
Known for her whiteboards and other equipment she uses to review complex issues during House hearings, Porter had a $1 expense stack on hand. He counted $17, then filed about 14 expenses and brandished $3 to show a government’s potential savings. execute the plan
Porter then reviewed with Collins some of the tactics on which personal plans spend their clients’ money, in addition to applying most of the premiums to medical expenses. These come with percentage buybacks for percentage holders, Porter said. He also noted that personal insurers spend more on executive compensation.
“Does Medicare spend on marketing? Private insurers like to call the PGA’s stadiums and tours. Is there a Medicare arena?” Porter asked rhetorically.
Last month, the St. Louis Post Dispatch reported that Centene Corp had reached a 15-year settlement for naming rights to a stadium in that city. other signs,” the newspaper said, adding that the terms of the deal were not disclosed. Centene’s business style relies heavily on profit while managing the care of other people covered through the government-funded Medicaid and Medicare programs.
Another is the Kaiser Permanente Arena in Santa Cruz, California, named after a nonprofit insurance giant.
Opting for the more sublime administrative flavor of government-run Medicare would leave money loose to expand benefits, Porter said.
“We could spend that money to allow patients to see dentists. We could spend that money to allow patients to pay for hearing aids, to help seniors with glasses, to reduce the cost of prescription drugs, to finally pay for intellectual fitness. “professionals for work. They do,” Porter said.
Biden’s budget requests for fiscal year 2023 call for $42. 5 billion for anti-addiction efforts, a $3. 2 billion buildup of existing annual spending.
In addition, the budget request proposes the call of the National Institute on Drug Abuse to the National Institute on Drugs and Drug Addiction and the call of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism to the National Institute on the Effects of Alcohol and Alcohol – Related Diseases.
“People should not ‘abuse’ drugs and alcohol; suffer from a disease known as addiction,” HHS said in a budget document, calling for an end to “outdated and stigmatizing language that harms Americans and families who suffer from it. “”of addiction”.
Biden’s budget also calls for what he describes as complete parity between physical and behavioral fitness care, which includes intellectual fitness and addiction care. The budget includes a $697 million request on new Bill 988 and the Behavioral Health Services Initiative. The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline Initiative will move from a 10-digit number to 9-8-8 in July 2022.
Other proposals in Biden’s budget request come with the following:
$7500 million for a new Mental Health Transformation Fund, to be allocated over 10 years to expand services, adding plans to expand “non-traditional physical care delivery sites” and the integration of addiction care and quality intellectual fitness into number one care facilities;
$4. 1 billion for an extension of investment for Community Mental Health Centers;
$1. 2 billion for the client’s policy and the creation of access to behavioral fitness facilities in the personal insurance market, adding a proposal to require a policy for 3 behavioral fitness visits at no cost to enrollees;
$3. 5 billion for Medicare’s intellectual fitness canopy, adding plans for 3 behavioral fitness visits consistent with one year without sharing charges and to remove the 190-day lifetime limit on psychiatric hospital services; and
$35. 4 billion to access intellectual fitness in Medicaid, adding plans to create a behavioral fitness functionality fund and to inspire the use of clinically appropriate criteria for behavioral fitness facilities covered by Medicaid.
Kerry Dooley Young is a freelance journalist founded in Washington, DC. She is to blame for the central issue of patient protection issues for the Association of Healthcare Journalists. the pharmaceutical industry and the Food and Drug Administration for Bloomberg. Follow her on Twitter in @kdooleyyoung.
For more information, Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.
Credits:
Main image: Medscape
Image 1: House Control and Reform Committee
Medscape © Medical News 2022
You have already decided on My Alerts
Click on the subject line below to receive emails when new items are available.