Advertising
Supported by
Guest essay
By Aaron E. Carroll
Dr. Carroll is the Director of Health at Indiana University and writes about physical care studies and policies.
Vaccines are imperative to creating widespread immunity against the coronavirus. But medicines that can treat covid-19 are also imperative to fight the pandemic. These other people can also benefit from treatment if they got sick. Others, such as immunocompromised people, may need more help fighting the disease.
Unfortunately, almost every step in the direction Americans can unload those drugs are designed to prevent them from falling off (which makes vaccination even more crucial).
To begin with, the treatments we have, although very useful, are not ideal in some aspects. A cycle of new treatments for covid-19 requires a user to take 30 paxlovid tablets or 40 molnupiravir tablets, a burden that many consider difficult.
While Paxlovid appears to reduce the risk of covid hospitalization and death by more than 85%, recent data shows that molnupiravir doesn’t seem to work as well, likely reducing covid hospitalizations and deaths by just 30%. There is also a fear that molnupiravir, by its operation, will lead to new variants.
But having medications, especially highly effective medications like Paxlovid, is essential. And for those drugs to be successful, they will need to be taken correctly. People should start taking them within five days of an infection, and due to deficiencies in our testing formula and other health care issues, it’s complicated to start remedying quickly.
Let’s start with the diagnosis. If you feel sick, you want a coronavirus test. A PCR test will likely take at least a day or two to return to the results, and that’s if you can locate the test. One option would be to use an antigen. check at home. Like everything else, those checks are rare when other people love them more. The government sends them to families for free if they sign up on a website, but you can only get 4 consistent with the family right now.
All internal tests beyond that charge money. The Biden administration has pledged that insurance will cover the costs (up to 8 per month), but this promise demands that you pay them out of pocket and then be reimbursed.
And that’s if you have insurance. For those who don’t, the administration plans to do the tests at underserved community sites, but to get them, other people want to know when they’ll be there and have a chance to get them back. Maximum probably have the maximum difficulty to do all this.
If your check is positive, you can’t go directly to a pharmacy for medication treatment like you did for the check. You want a prescription for the drug, which requires a stopover at the doctor. This assumes that you have a doctor. (many other people do not) and that an appointment is available. Before the pandemic, less than a portion of other people in the U. S. They could get a same-day or next-day appointment with their provider when they were sick.
If you are lucky enough to pass this glove successfully, you will have to fill your prescription now. Most insurances will limit where you can quote your medications, and it’s random that this pharmacy has pills in stock. Otherwise, I hope they will arrive a few days later, but those are valuable days.
Very few people perceive that much of the U. S. physical care formula is not used as a result. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration is designed to make care more difficult, an attempt to reduce overall spending on physical care. That’s why your insurance probably has higher deductibles than before, and more visits come with copay or coinsurance. But the poorest find it harder to cover those costs, widening disparities and making it harder for those in need of maximum assistance.
A recent study looked at how effectively Medicare beneficiaries (who were all elderly) achieved monoclonal antibody cure from 2020 to 2021 for Covid. He found that those who were most at risk were the least likely to be treated, largely because it was difficult to overcome those obstacles within 10 days of infection requiring treatment.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The government can also continue to send loose antigen tests to everyone, as other countries do. Test, they can start treatment right away. Pharmacists might be better able to communicate to patients if tablets are safe for them and dispense tablet packs without a prescription if patients qualify. Insurance companies can also simply replace your cost-sharing needs so that when you are in poor health, other people are encouraged to seek remedy for a serious illness, not avoid it.
Making adjustments like that would possibly not be easy. Before the pandemic, the option of pregnancy was one of the few “conditions” that allowed for detection and diagnosis at home. These tests have been strongly rejected by doctors and much of the rest of the physical care formula. Groups of doctors have also continuously struggled to empower pharmacies to provide care. Even if we were willing to make adjustments, who would pay for them?Our fragmented multi-pay formula is not well equipped to think and act collectively.
Some of these treatments, such as vaccines, can save lives. Things may not get any better yet here in the United States. However, it’s not because the drugs don’t work well. That’s because our health care formula doesn’t.
The Times has pledged to publish a series of letters to the editor. We would like to know what you think of this article or one of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: lettres@nytimes. com.
Follow the New York Times Opinion segment on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
Advertising