When Ghislaine Maxwell, the co-conspirator accused of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, first gave the impression in court after her arrest in July, Annie Farmer spoke to implore sentencing to keep Maxwell’s bars until the trial.
“She is a sexual predator who has treated me and abused me and many other young women and young women,” Farmer told the court.
Five months later, when Maxwell returned to court armed with a new $28. 5 million bail proposal and more than a dozen letters from a circle of family and friends, Farmer, 41, opposed Maxwell’s bail.
“I, she’s a psychopath,” Farmer wrote in a December 15 letter to U. S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan. ” He demonstrated a general inability to settle for duty in no way to his movements and demonstrated a total lack of remorse for his role in recruiting women to abuse them. “
Now, days after Nathan rejected Maxwell’s bail application, Maxwell’s legal team is attacking Farmer, publicly wondering his motives and credibility, according to new court documents filed in Farmer’s civil lawsuit supporting Maxwell and Epstein’s estate.
In what is likely to be a review of a possible defense strategy for Maxwell’s upcoming criminal trial, his lawyers reported that Farmer’s acceptance of a confidential settlement to offer a payment program for Epstein’s patients indicates a monetary incentive for Farmer to make “false claims” against Maxwell about occasions that allegedly happened in the mid-1990s.
“The fact that [the farmer] is asking the estate and Ms. Maxwell for cash in millions of dollars, while she is witnessing the government in a long-term criminal trial on the same subject, is an explanation of why it is enough to suspect that she comes from alleged memories of abuse , without corroboration, are not so much the facts or a preference for “justice” as her preference for cash,” Laura Menninger, Maxwell’s lawyer, wrote in a letter to the court on Wednesday night.
“The explanation for why manufacturing may be clearer,” the letter continued.
Farmer filed a civil lawsuit in November 2019, 8 months before Maxwell’s arrest, alleging that he had been a victim of sex trafficking at the age of 16 as a component of epstein and Maxwell’s “organized network to recruit young women and women for sexual purposes. “During 1996 at Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, Farmer claimed maxwell forced her to receive a massage and “touched personal parts of [her] body opposed to her will,” Farmer’s complaint.
Farmer suspended his civil lawsuit in June while filing his claims with Epstein’s Victims’ Compensation Program, a voluntary reimbursement fund that began operating before this year. In October, Farmer accepted an offer from the program, which requires him to abandon all pending litigation opposed to the estate and all former Epstein workers before he can collect.
But Maxwell’s legal team opposed dismissing the lawsuit, which is not easy for Farmer to first be required to disclose the amount of his settlement. Maxwell’s letter to court this week reiterates that request, a ruling told Maxwell’s lawyers this month that she would not order the data to be disclosed to Maxwell.
“The amount of cash [Farmer] receives from the Epstein program is in fact a matter of public interest and will move to the very center of the plaintiff’s credibility in the next criminal trial,” Menninger wrote in a letter to U. S. Peace Judge Debra Freeman.
Farmer, 41, has publicly become known as a “minor victim 2” in Maxwell’s criminal case and will be called as a witness if Maxwell’s case were attempted next summer. Maxwell is accused of facilitating and, in some cases, participating in epstein’s alleged sexual offences opposed to 3 underage girls, adding Farmer, between 1994 and 1997. Maxwell has pleaded not to be to blame for all the fees and denied the allegations in farmer’s civil case. Epstein died in federal custody in August 2019 pending trial for child sex trafficking
Sigrid McCawley, Farmer’s lawyer, responded temporarily in a letter to court thursday, calling Maxwell’s letter a “cruel, blaming the victim” attack on Farmer.
“Ms. Farmer will respond to Maxwell’s baseless lawsuit situations based on the merits of her case, her credibility, or her fully appropriate involvement in Maxwell’s Prosecution,” McCawley wrote. “Ms. Farmer simply claims that she keeps the accusations in her [trial] and all the statements she made in similar proceedings, and intends to testify honestly if called in long-term proceedings. “
McCawley’s letter also said Maxwell pays for any component of the proposed agreement offered for Epstein’s victim pay program.
“Maxwell will be very pleased that he escapes civil liability in this case without having to pay Ms. Farmer a penny,” McCawley wrote.
A similar dispute is unfolding lately in a civil case filed against Maxwell through some other witness probably in the criminal trial. Anonymous accuser Jane Doe accepted an offer to liquidate the payment fund this month and also close Doe’s accusations are substantially similar to those of the “minor victim 1” in the case of the offender.
But Maxwell demanded that Doe also disclose the amount of his agreement before agreeing to dismiss the lawsuit. And Maxwell also asked the court to order Doe to pay himself Maxwell’s legal fees at the trial. fired, Maxwell’s lawyers say, “necessarily for the same reasons as [Farmer] Array . . . a preference for getting his cash faster,” Menninger wrote.
Doe’s lawyer, Robert Glassman, told ABC News last week, “Obviously Maxwell will get unfair credit for all those victims. “
“She inexplicably asks for a sentence to qualify a child rape victim for her attorney’s fees and expenses. This is unacceptable and sad,” said Glassman, a lawyer at California law firm Panish, Shea.
The judgment delivered in Doe gave the parties until 15 January to verify and reach an agreement to dismiss the case for the parties. Maxwell’s lawyers are looking for a similar schedule in the Farmer case.
But Farmer’s lawyers are asking the court to interfere now and end the dispute and allow Farmer to get his payment from the payment fund.
“Ms. Farmer has been looking to close this case since October 14, when she asked the defendants to stipulate deportation,” McCawley wrote Thursday.
Policy 24/7 of the latest news and events.