In mid-September 2020, disobeying Twitter regulations prohibiting deceptive media, U. S. President Donald Trump shared a forged video with Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden twice in 24 hours. This was another example of the president’s no-brainer for the dissemination of erroneous data that can tarnish public perception.
A camera captured the former vice president betting Luis Fonsi’s 2017 Latin pop song “Despacito” from a mobile phone, smiling and jumping head-on a podium on a crusade in Kissimmee, Florida, on September 15, through C-SPAN video testing. The artist was present and also spoke on the occasion.
But the edited edition of the video shared through Trump replaced the pop song with N. W. A. ‘s 1988 single song, “Fuck Tha Police”, to show Biden as anti-cop. “What is all this?” Trump tweeted with the fake video.
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 16, 2020
Trump’s intentions or crusade were unclear, and it is also unknown whether the president knew the video had been manipulated before or after sharing it, and whether the crusade was intended to deceive the audience that could interpret the photographs as real.
No context, unless the tweets and trump subtitles discussed above, adding: “China drools. “They can’t!” we contacted the crusade on September 16th. The interview request showed the president’s tweets, adding fake images, as well as the original video clip in which Biden performed “Despacito”, with the following questions:
The crusade has still answered us. We will update this report when or if that is the case.
A media organization called “The United Spot” originally released the fake video with the anti-police anthem. The organization’s YouTube account, which has about 136,000 followers, says that “all videos are one hundred percent paradic/satirical” and its purpose is “to make you laugh. “
– The United Spot (TheUnitedSpot1) September 16, 2020
Many media outlets have reported Trump’s tweets sharing the fake video, which Twitter eventually called a “manipulated medium” to help the audience discern the facts of fiction. Fox News has described the president’s messages as “trolling” his opponent, or as a planned attempt to provoke online combat by exchanging provocative content.
At least one of the president’s allies, Jack Posobiec, celebrated the reactions of newscasts and others to tweets with manipulated videos, describing them as a strategic effort through the president to draw attention not only to a “embarrassed” moment for Biden. campaign, but also its “spectacular failure to help law enforcement. “(Note: Trump has continually claimed biden sided with left-wing progressives pushing to “de-finance the police,” Biden has said he opposes the concept. )
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 18, 2020
Posobiec, who has been a leader in high-level disinformation campaigns for years, wrote on The Post Millennial, a conservative website in Canada:
By now, it’s unexpected that Twitter and the media haven’t perceived Trump’s meme game, whenever he needs to magnify a message, just post an effective meme and the media will make the paintings for him.
– ???? Is silence gold???????? (@Silent_Kindling) September 16, 2020
In accordance with Twitter’s policies, site directors would likely tag tweets that have been misrepresented or fabricated or misrepresented. Meanwhile, the content that site controllers believe may also “have an effect on public protection or cause serious harm” would possibly be the policy said:
We are more likely to take action (tagging or removal) . . . on a larger manipulation bureaucracy, such as completely artificial audio or video or content that has been manipulated (spliced and rearranged, slowed down) to replace its meaning. [. . . ]
We also read about whether the context in which the media is shared can lead to confusion or a false impression or recommend a planned goal to deceive others about the nature or origin of the content, for example by falsely stating that it represents reality.
Law enforcement deception was not the first example of Trump’s tweet in a way that violated the policy explained above via Twitter, whether intentionally or not.
For example, in June 2020, the president shared a video showing a black boy being chased through a so-called white “racist bath,” followed by clips of those young men kissing. But the video was edited and manipulated with a fake news chyron. Twitter called the video, which is no longer visual at the time of writing this article, “manipulated media”, as well as the forged clip about Biden.
A few weeks later, the president continued a primary disinformation crusade over COVID-19 by sharing a video with a Texas physician named Stella Immanuel who stated without evidence that he had treated “hundreds” of COVID-19 patients and that the mask was not mandatory. to prevent the spread of the virus. (See our Emmanuel survey here, and keep in mind that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that everyone wear a mask when they are close to others during the pandemic. )By adding Twitter, he deleted the video after Trump shared it and was viewed millions of times.
As for Biden’s manipulated clips, in the absence of an interview with the Trump campaign, the president’s reasons for sharing the clips were unknown.
In theory, however, Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University who studies incorrect information on social media, told The Washington Post in early 2020 that politicians shared modified videos or misleading forgeries (such as Biden’s clip) to verify people’s prejudices.
In other words, the purpose of Biden’s video shared through Trump was not to convince Democrats to vote for Trump, but rather to reinforce the ideals among the president’s fans, using Linvill’s theory. “The more ingrained we are, the less imaginable I agree with the other side, ” he said.
Regarding politicians like Trump who convey misleading content, Becca Lewis, a Stanford University researcher who studies media manipulation, also told the Post:
They convey to an audience that already believes or feels safe about a politician, so when [the fact of manipulation] is revealed, other people don’t care . . . They say ‘this may have been true’ or ‘however, it reflects who the user really is. “In some cases there is a non-unusual form of apathy for the fact that it has been manipulated.
© 1995-2020 through Snopes Media Group Inc.
This curtain can be reproduced without permission.
Snopes and Snopes. com are registered service marks of Snopes. com
Your search didn’t work. Your search terms may want to be reviewed or we haven’t written an article on this topic.
One of the most productive tips for locating articles on our site is to avoid searches that are too long or too fast, so the optimal search strategy is to avoid pasting express words from parts (such as object lines and opening words) into our search. engine and instead focus on choosing a few unique words or names to use as search terms.
If you still can’t locate the item you’re looking for, use our shipping form to send it to us. We can’t communicate about him if we don’t know!
You’re in an article in a collection. View the entire collection.