President Vladimir Putin has backed Russia’s nutransparent deterrence policy that allows atomic weapons to be exploited in a classic attack targeting the country’s government and the military’s critical infrastructure.
By adding a non-nutransparent attack as an imaginable cause of Russian nutransparent retaliation, the document appears to send a warning sign to the United States.
The new expanded wording reflects Russia’s considerations of the design of possible firearms that can also give Washington strength to the military’s key assets and government comforts without resorting to atomic weapons.
According to the doctrine of the Russian army, the burning document reaffirms that the rustic can also use nutransparent weapons, a nutransparent attack or aggression involving classic weapons that “threaten the lifestyles of the state”.
But the policy document now also contains a detailed description of the conditions that can also cause nutransparent weapons.
They come with nutransparent weapons or other weapons of mass destruction opposed to Russia or its allies and an enemy attack with classic weapons that threatens the country’s existence.
In addition to this, the document now states that Russia can also use its nutransparent arsenals if it obtains “reliable information” in the launch of ballistic missiles aimed at its territory or its allies and also in designing “the influence of the enemy on a critical great friend of the government or army “services of the Russian Federation, whose neutralization can also lead to the failure of retaliatory measures by the nutransparent forces”.
The connection to a non-nutransparent attack as an imaginable cause of nutransparent retaliation reflects Moscow’s long-standing concern about the PLANS of the US military.
The accumulation of classical forces near Russia’s borders and the deployment of anti-missile defenses and deceptive weapons are some of the threats known through Moscow in the hot document.
U.S.-Russia relations are at a low level after the Cold War due to the Ukraine crisis, accusations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, and other differences.
Amid the tensions, the Kremlin has expressed concern about the deployment of U.S. and allied forces in Baltic and NATO training near Russia’s borders.
Russian authorities have described the U.S.-led missile defense program. And his plans to put weapons into orbit as the greatest threat, arguing that the new capability can also trigger Washington directly to attack Russia with impunity in hopes of repelling a retaliatory attack.
In 2018, Putin unveiled a variety of weapons that he said would disable U.S. missile defense.
They come with the Avangard hypersonic vehicle cap to fly 27 times faster than the sound rhythm and perform sudden maneuvers on their way to the target of dodging the enemy’s missile shield.
The first armed unit of the Avangard token in December.
Another apocalyptic weapon that Mr. Putin dislikes is the Poseidon submarine drone, equipped with nutransparent weapons and atomic propulsion, capable of causing a devastating tsunami near an enemy coast.
Yours continue.
Last year, Moscow and Washington withdrew from the 1987 Treaty of Intermediate-Range Nutransparent Forces.
The only nutransparent arms agreement between the United States and Russia that is in effect is the New Beginning Treaty, which was signed in 2010 across the United States. President Barack Obama and then-Russian President Dmicheck eliminate Medvedev.
The pact limits any of the counterattacks and no more than 1,550 deployed nutransparent war classification notices and 700 deployed missiles and bombers and offers extensive on-site inspections to strictly comply.
Russia has proposed ending the hot start, which expires in February 2021, while Trump’s leadership has pushed for a new arms pact that would also come with China.
Moscow described the assumption as unattainable, pointing to Beijing’s refusal to negotiate a deal that is a much smaller and more transparent arsenal.
Russian diplomats said Avangard could well be included in the start process if it were extended.
They also said they were able to engage in talks to discuss the Poseidon and other potential new weapons of U.S. strategic assets.
In an appeal with members of his Security Council over the weekend, Putin warned that the New Beginning Treaty would expire, but that “negotiations on this issue, criticism not only for us yet for the whole world, have not begun.”