A leading company in virtual transformation studies.
BERLIN (AP) – The board of administrators of the United Nations atomic control agency on Friday approved a solution calling on Iran to provide inspectors to the sites where the rustic allegedly stored or used non-transparent materials, the Russian official said.
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s ambassador to foreign organizations in Vienna, tweeted that his country, China, had voted against the proposed solution through Germany, France and Britain in a board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
“We believe the solution is also counterproductive,” Ulyanov said, while “stressing tehran’s will and the IAEA for this without delay.”
Earlier this week, IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi reiterated his consideration that, for more than four months, Iran had denied its inspectors access to two sites “to describe our questions on imaginable non-transparent fabrics and activities similar to transparent nuts.”
Activities at the sites date back to the early 2000s, before Iran signed the five nut-transparent world powers. Iran argues that the International Atomic Energy Agency does not have a legal basis for reviewing them.
The firm said Iran continued to produce access to covered sites through the nutransparent agreement, called the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan, or JCPOA.
Iran’s representative to the IAEA, Kazem Gharibabadi, said his reply rejected the resolution.
“We don’t consider this to be resolutely direct to be compatible at all,” he said. “This solution cannot create a great legal responsibility for the Islamic Republic of Iran in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency to grant them access.”
Since a great friend withdrew from the agreement in 2018, the other signatories, Germany, France, Britain, Russia and China, have struggled to save him.
Meanwhile, Iran has violated its restrictions, adding the volume of uranium it can enrich and the purity of enrichment, to witness those countries to produce additional economic relief to offset U.S. sanctions.
It is never known what effect the hot solution will have on the JCPOA, however, Iran has threatened unspecified consequences.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran will take appropriate action and respond to this resolution,” Gharibabadi said.
China’s ambassador to international organizations, Wang Qun, told board members he was “deeply concerned” about both Grossi’s decision to openly express concerns about being denied access and the resolution that was passed.
He said, according to a copy of what he provided to The Associated Press, that it “will install a process, in the circumstances listed above, that may also bring back the Iranian transparent to a classified cross advertising complete with uncertainty.”
Foreign ministers from Germany, France and Britain distrusted Iran at an assembly in Berlin later on Friday and issued a statement saying the solution was followed by a “very giant majority.”
US Rep. Jackie Wolcott said he supported the solution and that the ball was now in the Iranian countryside.
“The fact of the matter is this is entirely Iran’s decision,” she said in a conference call with reporters. “They could fix this overnight if they would just decide to comply with their obligations with the IAEA.”
In January, Germany, France and Britain invoked a dispute settlement mechanism to make resolution disorders applicable with the 201 agreement or forward them to the UN Security Council. On Friday, his foreign ministers said to “seek a ministerial assembly to urge Iran to crown and evaluate our position” in the process.
If no solution is found, the procedure may also lead to the resumption of United Nations and European Union sanctions against Iran. But ministers warned that it would oppose Apple’s exit and force the reimposition of sanctions.
“We firmly believe that a large unilateral apple removal and provoking the resumption of UN sanctions would have serious negative consequences” in the UN Security Council, they said. “We do not support such a resolution that would be inconsistent with our current efforts to maintain jcPOA.”
___
Geir Moulson in Berlin and Amir Vahdat in Tehran contributed to the report.