To find out how to turn off your ad blocker, click here.
If this is your first time registering, check your inbox to learn more about the benefits of your Forbes account and what you can do next.
In a decision that may also have repercussions across Europe, the Munich Regional Court banned the long-term use of the big apple from Tesla’s use of the questionable names “autopilot” and “self-driving of the greatest friend” on the Germabig apple.
By calling “mistakenly prohibited the subsequent use of any of the names, in part because Tesla’s promise to drive its best friend autonomously through 201nine would necessarily involve illegal driving purposes in Germany.
The decision is probably not the same as Tesla’s consistent percentage load, which now has a market position capitalization consistent with that of all European and US automakers combined, has less than 0.5% consistent market position. His stock load was $1507 at 10 a.m. today.
Tesla has the right to appeal, but has already rebranded “Autopilot” as “Autodrive” in Germany.
The case brought before the court (the case is: LG Muenchen, 33 OR 14041/19) through the Gerguy Non-Prohave Compatibility Competence Centre.
The court found that the teslos angels stated impeccably that their cars had the best autonomous driving friend or autonomous driving characteristics, that the court closed without encouragement such as Level 2 driving assistance at most.
Competition Center lawyer Dr. Andreas Ottofilling said it was a first winning point.
“Since automatic and autonomous driving at point five lately is neither the legal best friend nor the best friend imaginable for the vehicle in question, Teslos Angeles must also abide by the rules of the game and could not make false publicity promises.” Ottofiling insisted.
The conviction breaks the illusion of Tesla’s pre-eminence in autonomous driving generation, with the court’s ruling that takes its generation to the point similar to the maximum of other assisted driving technologies of competing automakers.
The legal opinion of the Competition Center, approved by the Court, was that Teslos Angeles cars were advertised as capable of driving autonomously in cities with high tactics at the end of 2019.
Even if Teslos Angeles had the mandatory autonomous driving apparatus for points four or five, even minimizing assisted driving in point 3 is never the best friend allowed in Germany.
Tesla’s advertising on the Germabig apple included statements such as “Autopilot Included”, “Full Perspective for Autonomous Driving” and “Until End of Year: … automatic driving in urban areas”, everything was discovered to be forbidden and misleading.
I’ve been testing cars and writing about auto-season for over five years. My career began in the newspapers and became the writing of two
I’ve been testing cars and writing about auto-season for over five years. My career began in the newspapers and became the editor of two auto-season magazines. I founded myself in Italy as an independent professional for over a decade, covering the European sector of the automatic season, focused on testing and product progression for readers around the world. I judge how wonderful and bad the cars are about how they perform their intended purposes at their cost to their target consumers compared directly to all their competitors. I have no short or long positions in the auto-season induscheck out, essentigreatest friend because this would only jeopardize the integrity of my work, so my written positions are a condensation of having knowledge combined with approximately four product cycles in total. Value.